Socratic AI coach

Your hands, reviewed - instead of an expensive coach

AI finds the leaks in your tournaments and walks you through each tricky hand - with questions, not ready-made advice, so you spot the mistake yourself.

No card required - your first tournament is reviewed free

Hand review

MTT · late stage

40 BB in your stack, you hold A♠ J♠ on the BTN. You 3-bet, the BB calls.

Flop K♦ 9♠ 4♦ · turn 7♣ · river Q♦. Your opponent bets the whole pot. You call.

Coach's question

What did you pay for on the river? Which of your opponent's hands do you beat here?

Loss on this hand

−18 BB

Similar decisions this tournament

4

Inside a review

These are not mockups - they are real product screens: the same table, the same grid, the same coach.

Table · Preflop
L5 · 125/250 (ante 35)
preflop
Pot 18BB
UTG
player 1
60 bb
fold
UTG+1
player 2
88 bb
fold
LJ
player 3
41 bb
fold
HJ
player 4
25 bb
fold
CO
player 7
52 bb
fold
15BB
D
BTN
player 5
0 bb
all-in 15BB
SB
player 6
33 bb
fold
1.0BB
55
BB
Hero
33 bb

The table at the decision point: pocket fives facing a BTN all-in preflop - the review starts here

AA
AKs
AQs
AJs
ATs
A9s
A8s
A7s
A6s
A5s
A4s
A3s
A2s
AKo
KK
KQs
KJs
KTs
K9s
K8s
K7s
K6s
K5s
K4s
K3s
K2s
AQo
KQo
QQ
QJs
QTs
Q9s
Q8s
Q7s
Q6s
Q5s
Q4s
Q3s
Q2s
AJo
KJo
QJo
JJ
JTs
J9s
J8s
J7s
J6s
J5s
J4s
J3s
J2s
ATo
KTo
QTo
JTo
TT
T9s
T8s
T7s
T6s
T5s
T4s
T3s
T2s
A9o
K9o
Q9o
J9o
T9o
99
98s
97s
96s
95s
94s
93s
92s
A8o
K8o
Q8o
J8o
T8o
98o
88
87s
86s
85s
84s
83s
82s
A7o
K7o
Q7o
J7o
T7o
97o
87o
77
76s
75s
74s
73s
72s
A6o
K6o
Q6o
J6o
T6o
96o
86o
76o
66
65s
64s
63s
62s
A5o
K5o
Q5o
J5o
T5o
95o
85o
75o
65o
55
54s
53s
52s
A4o
K4o
Q4o
J4o
T4o
94o
84o
74o
64o
54o
44
43s
42s
A3o
K3o
Q3o
J3o
T3o
93o
83o
73o
63o
53o
43o
33
32s
A2o
K2o
Q2o
J2o
T2o
92o
82o
72o
62o
52o
42o
32o
22

You answer range questions right on the grid - the parser counts combos and equity itself

Coach's verdict

You are right: calling with 55 is profitable here. If he shoves 20-25% of hands, the fives have about 54% equity at a 44% price. Losing does not make the call a mistake - it was a correct cooler, just bad luck.

A real verdict from a review

Why this beats the usual ways

Poker mistakes get fixed by review. The only question is which kind.

One-off coaching

Expensive and unsystematic

About $50 for a single review. Almost no one reviews micro stakes systematically.

Figuring it out yourself

Easy to get wrong

You might misread a spot, never find the answer, or mistake someone else's leak for a rule - cementing the mistake instead of fixing it.

Whygrid

from $7 per month

Your own hands. The parser does the math exactly, and the coach leads with questions - until you see where you spilled chips yourself.

What you get

Exact numbers

A parser, not guesswork

VPIP, chip losses, position - computed by a deterministic parser. The numbers are always right; the AI never makes them up.

Method

A question, not a ready answer

You're led to the solution with Socratic questions - you see the mistake and remember it yourself, instead of cramming someone else's tip.

Your game

Review of your own hands

Not abstract textbook spots, but the exact hands you played yourself.

How it works

/01

Upload a tournament

Sign up and drop in a tournament hand-history file from any major poker room - the first one is reviewed free. The parser walks through every hand.

/02

You'll be asked "why"

On a couple of the most debatable hands, the coach asks why you played it that way - before giving any verdict.

/03

See the gap

Compare your answer with the review - and see for yourself where your logic didn't match what happened at the table.

What the review is based on

Numbers

Computed by code, not AI

Equity, pot odds, outs, bet sizes, chip losses - all computed by a deterministic parser from your file. The same spot always gives the same number. The AI doesn't invent or recompute them - it only explains.

The norm

Graded against open charts

Opens are checked against charts - an average of the author's working charts and public MTT sources, not the model's guesswork. Not a GTO solver, but a working norm for micro-stakes tournaments. Nothing is hidden - the reference charts are open.

See the reference charts

The AI's role

Explains and asks

The AI leads with 'why did you play it this way', tests your logic against the numbers, and when unsure honestly asks about the opponent - instead of a blunt verdict. It computes nothing: the numbers are ready before it.

For the micro-stakes tournament (MTT) player - someone who plays every day, can't afford an hour with a coach, but wants to review every tournament on their own hands, not textbook examples.

If you're not sure

"Too expensive"

Cheaper than a single coaching session. One pot you don't spill over the long run pays for a month of the subscription.

"I don't buy it"

Don't take our word for it. Upload a tournament - the first review is free, and judge by your own hands.

"I'll figure it out myself"

You know the theory. The question is whether you see your recurring leaks across dozens of tournaments - that's exactly what the review shows.

Stop repeating the same mistakes

The first tournament is reviewed free. Upload your hand-history file - and see for yourself where you spill chips while the coach leads you with questions.

No card required - your first tournament is reviewed free

Whygrid - poker tournament reviews with an AI coach